The Torah study is dedicatedin the memory of
Asher Ben Haim
3408
The context of this warning is very understandable, as Bnei Yisrael had just been guilty of making a god of gold. Thus, Hashem had to reiterate and stress that the problem would arise again in full force when Bnei Yisrael would enter the Land and be exposed to the dangerous, local practices. What is more difficult to understand is the context of the immediately subsequent topic. The Torah goes into the matter of the three regalim (festivals), during which Bnei Yisrael were to go up to celebrate and serve Hashem at the religious center of the nation, the Mishkan and, later, the Beit Hamikdash (ibid. 34:18-26). What is the connection between the aftermath of the chet haegel and the regalim? And what need is there to discuss the regalim since the Torah said just about the same thing in Parashat Mishpatim?
It is possible that the key to the reference to the regalim is contained in the phrase of "lo yeira’u panay reikam" (they shall not see My Face empty-handed). What is this concept of seeing "Hashem’s Face," which is mentioned prominently in the section of the regalim more than once? The answer is that Hashem’s refusal to show His Face after the chet haegel would be relaxed, and Bnei Yisrael would be able to and be expected to go to see It in Yerushalayim during the festivals. These aliyot laregel, then, would serve as atonement for the chet haegel.
May we merit that we should soon be able to fulfill this special mitzva and have the special opportunity to encounter "Hashem’s Face" in the near future.
Daf Yomi Sanhedrin Daf 85
R' Eli Stefansky | 12 Adar 5785

Gold, Silver, Precious Stones – Closeness to Hashem – part III
Rabbi Yossef Carmel | Adar 5785
