- Sections
- P'ninat Mishpat
29
Ruling: If there were not a discussion between the sides in advance, then this would have been a classic case of one who lives in his friend’s house without permission and we would have had to determine whether this is a home that people usually pay for and whether the recipient was in need of its use (see Bava Kama 20b; Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 363:6-10).
However, since there was a discussion in advance and pl expressed that he did not agree that def should use it for free, the pertinent ruling is of the Rama (CM 363:6) – one cannot be forced to allow someone to use his property for free. Although it is possible to force someone who does not lose anything as a result to allow someone to use his property, that does not apply when the property owner could have used it himself, including by renting it out to someone else. The K’tzot Hachoshen posited that the determining factor is the wording of the one who lets his counterpart in, and here pl was clear. It is not important whether def was clear that he did not think he needed to pay.
Regarding the modem, it is possible to discuss whether, as one who agreed to host the modem and was receiving the apartment specifically with the modem within, def was a shomer chinam (unpaid watchman) or a shomer sachar (a paid watchman). This determination would be impactful here because the modem was apparently stolen. However, def and his painter did not see the modem when they entered the apartment, and therefore it is likely that it was stolen before def moved in, possibly by the cleaning staff. In that case, def never began being a watchman in the first place.
Therefore, def will pay pl 1,750 for half a month’s rent and is exempt from paying for the modem.

P'ninat Mishpat (766)
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit
573 - Compensating for a Breach of Exclusivity Agreement
574 - Overlapping Rentals
575 - A Homeowner Paying for Building Slowly
Load More

P'ninat Mishpat: Spillover of Courtyard Dispute
based on ruling 81059 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Tevet 5784

P'ninat Mishpat: Hezek Re’iya in Our Times
based on ruling 83126 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Cheshvan 5784

Complicated Employment Agreement – part I
Various Rabbis | Adar I 29 5779

A Will That Was Not Publicized
Rabbi Yoav Sternberg | Kislev 5768

Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit

Connecting Disciplines in Torah Study
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook #103 – part II
Sivan 8 5782

Interceding Regarding a Will
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook #105
Sivan 28 5782

Departure of an Uncle to Eretz Yisrael
Igrot Hare’aya – Letters of Rav Kook: Vol. I, #1 , p. 1-2 – part II
Tevet 21 5781

A Commercial Rental for a Closed Business – part II
based on ruling 80047 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Shvat 1 5782

The Birth of Hope
Bechukotai 5779
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks | Iyar 18 5779

Days on Which Tachanun Is Not Recited
Chapter Twenty One-Part Three
Rabbi Eliezer Melamed | 5775

Working in a Non-Kosher Establishment
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Sivan 14 5775

The Mitzvah of Mezuzah for Renters
Rabbi Hershel Schachter | כ' טבת תשס"א

P'ninat Mishpat: Upper Property’s Responsibility for Flooding
based on ruling 82008 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts
Beit Din Eretz Hemda - Gazit | Adar 5784
Daf Yomi Sanhedrin Daf 84
R' Eli Stefansky | 11 Adar 5785

Ask the Rabbi: Watching a Bar Mitzva Videoed on Shabbat
Rabbi Daniel Mann | Adar 5785
